Uncategorized
https://nerdist.com/article/expert-compares-coronavirus-contagion/
The movie Contagion explores how a deadly global pandemic could start and how people would respond to it. And the 2011 film has been a popular streaming choice since the public first became aware of the dangers of the novel coronavirus. It might seem weird that anyone would want to watch a fictional version of what we’re living through. But art has always been a way to cope with problems and process our feelings about the world. But does the movie get it right? Is the science of Contagion, as well as the reaction by scientists, politicians, and the public match what’s actually happening now? A pandemic disease expert analyzed the film to see how it compares to what’s happening with COVID-19.
It is way more authentic you might expect. Unfortunately, some of the places the movie got it wrong has more to do with real world failures few screenwriters could have predicted.
In this video from Wired, Dr. Seema Yasmin, pandemic expert and former epidemic intelligence officer, compares Contagion to the current timeline and handling of COVID-19. She used to have the job that Kate Winslet’s Dr. Erin Mears has in the film. But Winslet’s character’s fate is pure Hollywood, as Dr. Yasmin says no epidemic intelligence officer has ever died from the disease they were investigating.
But the film did a lot right, especially in its initial timeline. The event of Contagion do match up closely with the spread and response to COVID-19. (With one major exception—we almost certainly won’t have a vaccine as fast as they did in the movie.) And a lot of the science is spot on, even if there’s some forced exposition to characters who would already know a lot of the terminology.
Warner Bros.
However, its biggest inaccuracy is something that would have seemed unimaginable in 2011. The film’s snake oil salesman who pushes phony cures, played by Jude Law, isn’t someone the government is trying to stop. Our phony cures have been pushed by some people in our government.
Maybe that’s why so many have been watching Contagion during a real global pandemic. It features a competent response from our elected officials.
Featured Image: Wired
The post Pandemic Disease Expert Compares COVID-19 to CONTAGION appeared first on Nerdist.
The movie Contagion explores how a deadly global pandemic could start and how people would respond to it. And the 2011 film has been a popular streaming choice since the public first became aware of the dangers of the novel coronavirus. It might seem weird that anyone would want to watch a fictional version of what we’re living through. But art has always been a way to cope with problems and process our feelings about the world. But does the movie get it right? Is the science of Contagion, as well as the reaction by scientists, politicians, and the public match what’s actually happening now? A pandemic disease expert analyzed the film to see how it compares to what’s happening with COVID-19.
It is way more authentic you might expect. Unfortunately, some of the places the movie got it wrong has more to do with real world failures few screenwriters could have predicted.
In this video from Wired, Dr. Seema Yasmin, pandemic expert and former epidemic intelligence officer, compares Contagion to the current timeline and handling of COVID-19. She used to have the job that Kate Winslet’s Dr. Erin Mears has in the film. But Winslet’s character’s fate is pure Hollywood, as Dr. Yasmin says no epidemic intelligence officer has ever died from the disease they were investigating.
But the film did a lot right, especially in its initial timeline. The event of Contagion do match up closely with the spread and response to COVID-19. (With one major exception—we almost certainly won’t have a vaccine as fast as they did in the movie.) And a lot of the science is spot on, even if there’s some forced exposition to characters who would already know a lot of the terminology.
Warner Bros.
However, its biggest inaccuracy is something that would have seemed unimaginable in 2011. The film’s snake oil salesman who pushes phony cures, played by Jude Law, isn’t someone the government is trying to stop. Our phony cures have been pushed by some people in our government.
Maybe that’s why so many have been watching Contagion during a real global pandemic. It features a competent response from our elected officials.
Featured Image: Wired
The post Pandemic Disease Expert Compares COVID-19 to CONTAGION appeared first on Nerdist.
For the last three years, education secretary Betsy DeVos has been working on overhauling the federal policies on how college campuses handle instances of sexual assault, rolling back Obama-era protections for assault victims. She’s finally completed her directive and it has everything she wanted: more protections for those accused of assault, a heavier burden for victims, less responsibility for the schools, and a despicably narrowed definition of what even constitutes assault and harassment in the first place. It’s a patriarchal masterpiece.
Title IX is meant to protect students from sexual harassment, assault, and discrimination at public and private schools that receive federal funding. Under the Obama administration, new guidelines were issued to push schools to actually investigate and take action to stop and prevent those things. DeVos just made it a lot easier for them to go back to ignoring them.
Under the old guidelines, a school was mandated to act if it “knows or reasonably should know” about an instance of abuse, requiring only a “preponderance of evidence” (meaning basically just a good amount). DeVos’ guidelines allow the schools to avoid investigating until they are presented with “clear and convincing evidence.”
Colleges are now required to hold live hearings in which the accused and accuser can be cross-examined. The Obama administration discouraged cross-examination because it so often relies on smearing and discrediting victims. It also potentially gives an advantage to wealthier students who can hire private counsel.
The Washington Post notes that “advocates for sexual assault victims say the provision could subject survivors to more trauma and discourage them from coming forward. And universities complained that the requirement would turn their campuses into courtrooms.”
Also, for a school to be found legally responsible for an incident, they now have to be found to have been “deliberately indifferent” to the violation.
“Too many students have lost access to their education because their school inadequately responded when a student filed a complaint of sexual harassment or sexual assault,” DeVos said in a statement. But while the Obama-era guidelines pushed them to respond, you know, adequately, DeVos is going a different direction.
And where the Obama administration defined sexual harassment (a blanket term that includes assault and descrimination) as “unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature,” as well as “unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature,” DeVos has redefined it as “unwelcome conduct on the basis of sex that is so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person equal access to the recipient’s education program or activity.”
DeVos’s office claims that these new guidelines take “historic action to strengthen Title IX protections for all students.” But what she really means is that they strengthen protections for the accused and for the schools—everyone except the victims. And that makes sense since DeVos kicked off her Title IX reform project by taking meetings with a bunch of men’s rights groups who are famous for their belief that most sexual assault charges are false. That’s who DeVos sought counsel from on these issues.
DeVos had reportedly planned to release these new guidelines late last year but they had to postpone because of the overwhelming number of comments they received in opposition to the proposal—more than 100,000 comments in total. But it’s not like the new timing benefits students, despite the claim that that’s who this is supposed to ultimately benefit.
STUDENTS: we are literally hanging on by a thread trying to fulfill academic obligations during a global pandemic
BETSY DEVOS: …anyway! Here’s a new Title IX rule attacking student survivors’ rights.
#DearBetsy, it’s time to resign. #HandsOffIX— Rep. Barbara Lee (@RepBarbaraLee) May 5, 2020
(via Washington Post, New York Times, image: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!
—The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—
TL; DR: The sleekest bamboo caddy tray for your bathtub at $46.97.
The lockdown means a whole lot of things to a whole lot of people, but one tiny, positive way to look at it is that there has never been a better time to soak like a teabag in your bathtub than right now. You don’t even really need a reason to take a long bath anymore. You and bae feeling bored? Take a bath. Don’t have no bae but still want to treat yourself? Take a bath. Lockdown szn got you feeling hella stressed? A warm bath will have you feeling better, sis.
And now, thanks to Argo Brands, you can make your bath time a lot more fun. Their Bamboo Caddy Tray has got all the compartments you need if you wish to live in your tub, literally. It’s got a ton of slots for different accessories: A wine glass holder if you like to calm your nerves with a few sips while you play some Sade in the bath, a phone slot and tablet holder so you can catch up on Insecure while you relax, a candle slot for when it’s time to set the mood, and most importantly, a soap holder for, well, soap. The Caddy Tray also has extendable handles that stretch all the way to 43″, so it can fit almost any tub. It’s also got two side trays for those who like to have a lil’ snack time in the bathtub (we ain’t judging).
For a tray that’s so efficient, the Argo caddy is also pretty light, weighing a mere 4lbs. You don’t need to worry about the tray slipping off the tub and making a mess, as it’s got a tight silicone grip that won’t slip. The tray itself is made with high-quality, Eco-friendly bamboo materials that are also waterproof and sturdy AF. It’s basically the Swiss army knife of caddy trays, and that’s why it was selected as one of the best choices on Amazon at 4.7/5 stars.
Don’t think all these dope features mean that you’ve got to spend a fortune — the Argo tray is also pretty affordable. For just $46.97, you too can cop one of these versatile caddies, and your bathing experience will never remain the same.
Luxury 100% Bamboo Bathtub Caddy Tray – $46.97
MadameNoire has teamed up with StackCommerce to offer you the best deals on the web. We may get a share of the revenue from your purchase.