Uncategorized
https://nerdist.com/article/thunderbolts-screenwriter-didnt-know-character-taskmaster-fate/
The marketing for Thunderbolts* showed many characters from previous MCU projects as part of the roster. Aside from Bucky Barnes, There were characters from Ant-Man and the Wasp, The Falcon and the Winter Soldier, and most prominently, three characters from Black Widow. But one of those characters, Antonia Dreykov, aka Taskmaster (Olga Kurylenko), did not last long in the movie. In fact, she’s killed by Ghost early in the first act. But via Polygon, we’ve learned that the original Thunderbolts* screenwriter, Eric Pearson, originally had a much longer arc in mind for her. And she lived till the end of the movie. Here’s what he had to say:
It was decided after my work. When I sat down to watch the first cut, one thing was totally different and shocked the hell out of me, and it was that. Everything else, I was like, ‘Yeah, that’s the movie that I wrote!’ But that decision…you’d have to ask [director] Jake Schreier or [Marvel Studios president] Kevin [Feige] or [co-credited screenwriter] Joanna [Calo], maybe. But if I were to guess, it would be to get the reaction that I had as an audience member, like, ‘Whoa, we’re upping the stakes, we’re doing something drastic really fast, and we’re putting everybody on edge.
Pearson also added that Taskmaster had a whole subplot in his draft, and that she bonded with Ava/Ghost in particular. She also added humor to the film in a sense, as her backstory is so tragic, she’d often point it out to the rest of the team whenever they wallowed too much in self-pity. There was also a running gag about how Taskmaster kept forgetting she didn’t have to kill U.S. Agent/John Walker anymore. Pearson said “She was struggling with her own memory-loss stuff. And there was a gag where she just kept restarting the fight and forgetting that they had made up and become friends.” Ok, we have to admit, that would have been funny to watch.
Was it a mistake to cut all that Taskmaster stuff out? Hard to say. Thunderbolts* has a pretty tight script with a lot of characters to service, and it does a pretty good job at that. Adding one more for the full movie might have bogged it down, and been one character arc too many. All of that would have added to the running time as well. Still, it’s wild that the movie’s credited screenwriter didn’t even know until he saw the final film. Marvel Studios, you sure do love to keep your secrets. Even from your own writers it seems.
The post THUNDERBOLTS* Screenwriter Didn’t Know a Character’s Dark Fate Until He Saw the Movie appeared first on Nerdist.
The marketing for Thunderbolts* showed many characters from previous MCU projects as part of the roster. Aside from Bucky Barnes, There were characters from Ant-Man and the Wasp, The Falcon and the Winter Soldier, and most prominently, three characters from Black Widow. But one of those characters, Antonia Dreykov, aka Taskmaster (Olga Kurylenko), did not last long in the movie. In fact, she’s killed by Ghost early in the first act. But via Polygon, we’ve learned that the original Thunderbolts* screenwriter, Eric Pearson, originally had a much longer arc in mind for her. And she lived till the end of the movie. Here’s what he had to say:
It was decided after my work. When I sat down to watch the first cut, one thing was totally different and shocked the hell out of me, and it was that. Everything else, I was like, ‘Yeah, that’s the movie that I wrote!’ But that decision…you’d have to ask [director] Jake Schreier or [Marvel Studios president] Kevin [Feige] or [co-credited screenwriter] Joanna [Calo], maybe. But if I were to guess, it would be to get the reaction that I had as an audience member, like, ‘Whoa, we’re upping the stakes, we’re doing something drastic really fast, and we’re putting everybody on edge.
Pearson also added that Taskmaster had a whole subplot in his draft, and that she bonded with Ava/Ghost in particular. She also added humor to the film in a sense, as her backstory is so tragic, she’d often point it out to the rest of the team whenever they wallowed too much in self-pity. There was also a running gag about how Taskmaster kept forgetting she didn’t have to kill U.S. Agent/John Walker anymore. Pearson said “She was struggling with her own memory-loss stuff. And there was a gag where she just kept restarting the fight and forgetting that they had made up and become friends.” Ok, we have to admit, that would have been funny to watch.
Was it a mistake to cut all that Taskmaster stuff out? Hard to say. Thunderbolts* has a pretty tight script with a lot of characters to service, and it does a pretty good job at that. Adding one more for the full movie might have bogged it down, and been one character arc too many. All of that would have added to the running time as well. Still, it’s wild that the movie’s credited screenwriter didn’t even know until he saw the final film. Marvel Studios, you sure do love to keep your secrets. Even from your own writers it seems.
The post THUNDERBOLTS* Screenwriter Didn’t Know a Character’s Dark Fate Until He Saw the Movie appeared first on Nerdist.
With the Fireflies dead and without anywhere else to go, Abby and her friends headed towards Washington. In the first scene from The Last of Us’ second season, Owen told them, “Ed has a brother who runs an outfit in Seattle. A guy named Isaac.” Two episodes later, we saw that Isaac’s outfit isn’t some small regional group like Eugene used to talk about. It’s the city’s ruling power, a well-armed militaristic operation. In episode four we finally got to meet the man who runs it, Jeffrey Wright’s Isaac Dixon. He voiced the character in the video game, but what did we learn about the TV version of W.L.F.’s leader? He’s as ruthless as the organization he defected from, FEDRA.
Before he joined the Washington Liberation Front, Isaac Dixon was a FEDRA sergeant in Seattle’s Quarantine Zone. In 2018 Isaac left FEDRA with an actual bang. He blew up his own soldiers (minus one new recruit he took with him) when he formally joined W.L.F. The resistance group knew he was coming. They were waiting for him.
As Isaac pointed out that day. FEDRA mockingly referred to Seattle’s citizens as “voters” because the group had stripped people of its rights. That tyranny was the apparent impetus for Isaac’s defection. FEDRA was already fighting W.L.F. for some time when Isaac killed his squad. By 2029, the present timeline on HBO’s The Last of Us, the fight was long over. FEDRA was gone in Seattle. W.L.F. had eliminated the organization and taken control of FEDRA’s weapons and supplies. In episode four, Ellie noticed that FEDRA soldiers turned on each other, indicating some elected to join Isaac and W.L.F.
In episode three we learned what Isaac had accomplished. Large, armed W.L.F. patrols march through the city’s streets with tanks. The Washington Liberation Front also controls Seattle’s hospitals and has outposts in strategic locations.
They also have their own enemy, Seraphites, who W.L.F. calls “Scars.”
W.L.F. is a militaristic organization with hi-tech weapons led by a soft-spoken man who was once shy around woman, a man with a fondness for cooking and Williams Sonoma cookware. The primitivism Seraphites worship a dead prophet whom some believe was actually a god. (Scars who think she was just a normal woman are considered “heretics” by fellow followers.) And at some point the two very different groups had a truce. Who broke it and why is unknown and no longer matters. “F***ed up” Seattle’s two biggest sects are at war. And Isaac, despite defecting from and then defeating the oppressive FEDRA, employs violent tactics against his enemy.
He tortured a captured Scar to find out information about the Seraphites’ next attack. When he knew he would be unable to extract the info, Isaac murdered his prisoner. One guard outside the kitchen found the whole thing repulsive, showing not every wolf soldier agrees with Isaac’s tactics. But the very FEDRA soldier Isaac spared in 2018 was fully behind his leader.
The W.L.F. and the Seraphites truly hate one another. Wolves torture Scars. Scars string up and disembowel wolves. And both kill their enemy’s children. But only one side ever seems to join the other. Isaac’s prisoner told him the Seraphites will win, because it’s not about weapons or land. It’s because every day a wolf joins the Scars, while no Scar ever joins W.L.F.
Isaac disputed everything that ill-fated man said except for that. Is that why he really killed that Scar? Only he knows for sure, but everything we’ve learned about the TV version of Jeffrey Wright’s character indicates the war between W.L.F. and the Seraphites isn’t going to end anytime soon. And it’s not going to get any less deadly.
Mikey Walsh is a staff writer at Nerdist. He’s very anti torture even though he’s very pro Jeffrey Wright. You can follow him on Bluesky at @burgermike. And also anywhere someone is ranking the Targaryen kings.
The post What HBO’s THE LAST OF US Revealed About W.L.F.’s Isaac Dixon appeared first on Nerdist.
Star Wars is not great because of the Force. It is great because of the ones who fight when no one believes they can win.
There was a time when getting a Star Wars show on TV felt like a miracle. One show. One small corner of the galaxy. Something that did not need a Jedi or a Skywalker to be meaningful.
Then came The Mandalorian.
Season One gave us something simple and powerful: a bounty hunter, a child, and the slow unlearning of a lifetime spent surviving instead of living. It felt fresh without feeling forced. Season two built on that beautifully, blending new ground with just enough callbacks to the old galaxy we grew up with. Characters mattered. Choices mattered. It did what the best Star Wars stories do: it made a massive galaxy feel small and intimate.
But by season three, something shifted. The heart of the story got lost in detours and distractions. The emotional core that made Din Djarin and Grogu’s bond feel real got buried under fan service and side quests. Instead of telling a story about belonging, survival, and identity, the show started chasing bigger battles and broader lore without always earning it. The Mandalorian became more about the idea of Star Wars than the story that had made it special.
When Ahsoka was announced, it sounded like everything fans had been waiting for. It promised to bridge the gap between Rebels, The Mandalorian, and the wider galaxy. It had legacy characters we loved. It teased Thrawn’s return. It promised stakes that stretched across multiple shows. And on the surface, it delivered. There were jaw-dropping lightsaber battles. Rosario Dawson fully embodied the world-weariness of Ahsoka Tano. Visually, the show was stunning. But storytelling is not just about hitting nostalgia beats. Ahsoka’s emotional journey felt muted. Characters often moved not because it made sense for them, but because the plot demanded it. The connective tissue was missing.
It felt less like a story and more like a collection of “moments” meant to remind us why we loved the animated series, without giving those moments a new life of their own.
Meanwhile, The Bad Batch has been consistently crafting some of the best emotional arcs in recent Star Wars storytelling: watching Omega grow up in a world built to crush hope has been a slow-burn heartbreak. The writing has been smart, the character development has been rich. But because it is animated, it often gets pushed to the sidelines.
It deserves better. And frankly, so do the fans who show up for every story, not just the ones with lightsabers.
Then there was The Acolyte, a show that had the potential to open a completely new chapter of the galaxy. The High Republic era. Different politics. Different dangers. Different moral questions. For once, we were promised a world not built around the familiar timelines and bloodlines.
But instead of getting a full exploration, the story was cut short. Whether by internal politics, shifting creative decisions, or Disney/Lucasfilms not defending the content they created from the toxic fanboys and racist trolls, The Acolyte was not allowed to breathe the way it needed to. What could have been a bold new chapter became an unfinished sentence.
And yet, somehow, in the middle of all of this, Skeleton Crew and Andor stand tall. Two shows that could not be more different in tone but are united by one critical truth: They remember that Star Wars is at its best when it is about ordinary people facing impossible odds.
Skeleton Crew strips the galaxy down to a single terrifying idea: what happens when you are young, alone, and lost far from anything familiar? It is a coming-of-age story that does not need Jedi or Sith to create tension. It does not ask the audience to believe in destiny. It asks them to believe in fear, in hope, and in the stubborn refusal to give up when the universe is bigger and colder than you ever imagined.
Andor does something even rarer. It peels back the mythos of the rebellion until all that remains is human cost. There are no chosen ones here. No prophecies. No grand battles between good and evil written in the stars. There are only frightened, desperate people willing to risk everything because they cannot survive another day under the Empire’s boot. Andor shows that rebellion is not built on heroism. It is built on grief. On rage. On choice after impossible choice made in the dark.
Both shows remind us that Star Wars is not just about the Force or ancient wars between empires.
It is about survival.
It is about fighting for a future you may never get to see.
It is about ordinary people becoming extraordinary, not because they are destined to, but because they refuse to do anything else.
The future of Star Wars does not need to be bigger; it just needs to be more honest and organic. And maybe, just maybe, the real path forward is not up among the stars — but down in the dirt, where real rebellions are born.
Cover image via Starwars.com
Want to get Black Nerd Problems updates sent directly to you? Sign up here! Follow us on BlueSky, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Twitch, and Instagram!
The post Fighting in the Dirt: Why ‘Andor’ and ‘Skeleton Crew’ Are ‘Star Wars’ Television at Its Best appeared first on Black Nerd Problems.