Uncategorized

After 17 years apart, Angolan immigrant Walter is joined in the U.S. by his wife and teen daughter. Now absolute strangers sharing a one bedroom Brooklyn apartment, they struggle to overcome the emotional distance between them. Walter is trying to let go of a previous relationship while his wife Esther struggles with a new country, culture and a husband who seems distant.

Their daughter Sylvia is a dancer just like her father, and while she also finds her new life difficult, she bravely starts to explore the city and show herself through dance. The film is both a universal immigrant story and the unique perspective of three characters bound together by history and hope. It is an intimate and deeply personal look at an inter-generational tale that has defined America since its inception.

The film stars Ntare Guma Mbaho Mwine (The Chi), Zainab Jah (False Positive), Jayme Lawson (The Batman), Nana Mensah (Beasts of No Nation), Joie Lee (She’s Gotta Have It), and Marcus Scribner (Blackish).

Directed by Ekwa Msangi

IFC Films will release the film in theaters and on demand on December 11, 2020.

Finally, the Presidential debates are over and the final one was something. Thanks to new rules established after the last mess, the candidates were not allowed to speak while the other one answered the question the first time. There were far fewer interruptions and without the interruptions, we could sure hear the lies better.

I’m pre-fact-checking Trump’s next statement as a lie.

— Arianna Huffington (@ariannahuff) October 23, 2020

Liar.

— Rashida Tlaib (@RashidaTlaib) October 23, 2020

First, he said he was cured of COVID, after falsifying the progress the US has made against the virus, and also downplaying his own failures. He also lied about when a vaccine will be available, saying it would be out in weeks and contradicting his own experts when it. He lied about Joe Biden and foreign interference. He lied about … well, just everything. Trying to face check the President was exhausting and also easy. If he was talking, he was lying.

From a lying perspective, Trump is even worse tonight than in the first debate.

— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) October 23, 2020

President Trump repeatedly excused President Vladimir Putin’s behavior and is not known to have confronted him about a CIA assessment that Russia offered bounties for killing U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

Find our fact checks for the #Debates2020 here. https://t.co/21qxKPrCVb pic.twitter.com/0XyX5RVrw5

— The New York Times (@nytimes) October 23, 2020

It was … exhausting. Donald Trump constantly just made stuff up. And the few times he told the truth, he was praising dictators and election interference. And that was only the first half. Trump kept on Trumping the whole time, but Joe Biden was unrelenting on not letting his off the hook for his lies.

“But you’re the President.” This moderator is great at concise interjections.

— Saeed Jones (@theferocity) October 23, 2020

Biden won the last debate by default. He is winning tonight by simply kicking Trump’s ass like a Professor debating a monkey who just learned to paint circles and now thinks he understands Plato.

— Josh Gad (@joshgad) October 23, 2020

“C’mon!” is pretty much the perfect punctuation to every point Biden makes #Debates2020

— Dave of Doom Lives In October Country (@geeksofdoom) October 23, 2020

But how did that mute button work? Well … there was still a lot of interrupting and yelling. But moderator Kristen Welker was far more firm with the President, but he still managed to talk over her as much as he could.

live footage of whoever’s in charge of the mute button right now #Debates2020 pic.twitter.com/sFZwVn3VhI

— emma lord (@dilemmalord) October 23, 2020

MUTE BUTTON HELLO

— Sarah Cooper (@sarahcpr) October 23, 2020

the moderator using the mute button tonight pic.twitter.com/7j3Twycsm9

— 🥇 (@SteeloCity) October 23, 2020

This debate has a fever and the only prescription is more mute button pic.twitter.com/VlG7Aecgrt

— Jay Smooth (@jsmooth995) October 23, 2020

Who’s in charge of this mute button? JEFFREY TOOBIN!?????!!????

— Julie Klausner (@julieklausner) October 23, 2020

The most powerful moments came however when Joe Biden got fired up. It was seriously powerful to see Biden refute Trump dumping on Democratic governors and cities by saying he would be a president for all of America. He excoriated Trump for his child separation policy. But the final half of the debate Biden was on fire with gumption.

you can see Biden feel physically ill when Trump lies about how well migrant children are being treated

— Jesse Lehrich (@JesseLehrich) October 23, 2020

A “well cared for” child who has been ripped from their parents and orphaned due to cruel policies is not “well-cared for.” Period. #Debates2020

— Misha Collins — VOTE YOUR ASS OFF! (@mishacollins) October 23, 2020

Biden also hit Trump hard when the topic of race came up and Trump started lying again and hysterically claiming that he was the least racist person in the room and the best President for Black since Abraham Lincoln. It was completely insane and Joe called him out on it. And Trump didn’t get the joke when Biden did.

Biden sarcastically refers to Trump as “Abraham Lincoln,” and Trump gets confused by it pic.twitter.com/Ogdt1QXf3g

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) October 23, 2020

And then … Trump started lying again. By that time, it was hard to follow but he started talking about how stopping climate change would lead to buildings with very small windows. It was long past time to start drinking when that started up. But Welker

“I know more about wind than you do.” You sure do, Trump, because you’re full of fucking hot air.

— kathy iandoli (@kath3000) October 23, 2020

I’m so afraid someone is going to take away my windows and replace them with smaller ones.

— April Henry (@aprilhenrybooks) October 23, 2020

TRUMP 2020: YOUR WINDOWS WILL BE HUGE

— Sarah Cooper (@sarahcpr) October 23, 2020

Calling an emergency meeting with the Squad. #smallwindows pic.twitter.com/pps2cPRLem

— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) October 23, 2020

In the end, Joe Biden’s closing statement was that character was on the ballot, as well as policy, and that it was clear that only one person on the stage tonight had character. This debate certainly opened a very large window on to that.

(image: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

—The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

There is perhaps no “game” that sparks as much curiosity and fear as a Ouija board. The flat board with numbers, letters, a few words, and a planchette (aka the board’s moving device) is generally synonymous with breaking the veil between the living and dead realms. Many see it as a tool to open horrifying portals while others use it to curiously commune with “the other side.”

It is also a staple in horror stories, pop culture, entertainment, and certain spiritual practices for many decades. But, despite being such a looming part of our culture, most people don’t know the complex history behind Ouija boards.

The Birth of the Ouija Board

According to Smithsonian Magazine, the Ouija board stems from Spiritualism, a belief that the dead can communicate with the living. Of course, this idea is something that has existed on a global scale for thousands of years. But, it became quite prominent in the United States during the 19^th century when childbirth, war, and disease among other things led to shorter life spans and frequent deaths. Many people desired a pathway to connect with lost loved ones and get answers to unresolved issues and questions.

The concept of contacting the dead was seen as socially acceptable and even wholesome in many circles. Of course, this is likely because the faces of Spiritualism were white people. For example, in 1848, people became enraptured by Maggie and Kate Fox, two young sisters who claimed to get messages from spirits through taps on their walls. Their abilities made them household names and further sparked public interest in reaching out to deceased people.

This lead to the birth of “talking boards,” the precursor to the Ouija board, in the late 1880s. It had letters, numbers, and a small cursor to point towards its script. It’s not clear who came up with the first talking board. But technically that person should get credit for laying the groundwork for Ouija boards. Today, Ouija board, talking board, and spirit board are all interchangeable terms to describe the same tool.

It wouldn’t be the American way if someone didn’t try to further capitalize on the popularity of séances and personal pain, right? And, like most American origin stories, there is a lot of messiness behind the Ouija board’s beginnings. Charles Kennard of Baltimore, Maryland didn’t care about the spiritualism movement but he did see a profitable business opportunity. The (allegedly) shady businessman teamed up with coffin maker/undertaker E.C. Reiche, a Prussian immigrant, to start producing their own wooden boards. But, when Kennard starting looking for investors, he took credit for the invention.

There’s some debate over Reiche’s actual involvement. As reported by MyEasternShoreMD, information about Reiche’s life is spotty at best with little official records and no real credit to him being the Ouija board creator. This makes sense if Kennard simply took credit for Reiche’s handiwork. But, if that is the case, then why didn’t Reiche at least try to put up a legal or verbal fight for his creation? However, leading talking board expert Robert Murch told Baltimore Magazine that Reiche was indeed involved with early productions only to be cut out by Kennard. Ouch.

After Kennard’s many failed attempts to secure funding, attorney Elijah Bond became interested. They formed Kennard Novelty Company in 1890 along with other investors like William H.A. Maupin, Colonel Washington Bowie, and John F. Green. Bond’s sister-in-law Helen Peters also played a key role in creating its handle and possibly the name. Kennard and his colleagues claimed that the board named itself after they asked it. The board said Ouija is an ancient Egyptian phrase which means “good luck.”

USPTO

There’s also a popular albeit nonsensical belief that Ouija is a combination of the French and German words for “yes” (oui + ja). Peters later said she wore a locket with a picture of a woman with the word “Ouija” over it. It is also possible that the name on the locket may have been misread, especially considering there was a prominent author and activist named Ouida at that time. So, even the name itself boasts a history of (possible) magic and mystery.

However, Peters did convince the patent office to approve the Ouija board’s application. She did this through a demonstration that spelled out the officer’s supposedly unknown name. It’s unlikely that they wouldn’t already know the officer’s name but it’s another interesting addition to the origin story. A patent file confirms she did a demonstration and the patent was issued on February 10^th 1891.

The company soon brought Bond’s employee William Fuld into the fold, they began to produce boards. They became a hit, quickly opening additional factories before Kennard and Bond’s unceremonious booting out of the business. Fuld took over but he strangely died in 1927 after falling from the roof of a new factory – one he claimed a Ouija board told him to build.

The “Ouija, the Wonderful Talking Board” game became a cultural staple when it hit shelves for $1.50 in 1891. It was a direct path to ancestors but also a bit of intriguing and escapist Friday night fun amid a tumultuous world. People would gather with family or friends and experience the rush of asking questions as the (then) wooden planchette jumps around to provide an otherworldly answer. Their intentions were by all accounts what many would consider pure. The Ouija board began to appear in sketches for major newspapers and grew in popularity through the disparity of the Great Depression.

Saturday Evening Post/Norman Rockwell

Writers like Pearl Curran and Pulitzer Prize-winning poet James Merrill all began to use the board for creative inspiration. There were people from certain religious and spiritual backgrounds who saw the board as a form of divination (seeking information from spiritual forces,) which their beliefs condemn. It fell under the umbrella term of witchcraft, which they associated with ungodly deeds.

TV shows took a jovial approach to using a Ouija board. I Love Lucy episode “The Séance” depicts Lucy faking a séance to find favor with a businessman. However, several stories began to surface about Ouija boards and murder.

In 1930, Clothilde Marchand was killed by Lila Jimerson, who was having an affair with Marchand’s husband. Jimerson used a Ouija board to convince an associate, Nancy Bowen, that Marchand was a “witch” who caused Bowen’s husband’s death. Jimerson and Bowen later pled guilty to manslaughter. Despite dark stories involving the Ouija board, many people did not see it as an inherent void of evil. In fact, forty years after Fuld’s death, Ouija boards outsold than Monopoly games.

Pop Culture Changes Real-Life Attitudes

Interestingly, the change in attitudes towards the Ouija board stems from none other than The Exorcist in 1973.

The supposedly “based on a true story” (which has its share of debatable and murky details) seminal horror flick about a girl who is possessed by a demon after playing with a Ouija board scared the fear of Hell into people. It also didn’t help that The Exorcist‘s release came at an already uneasy time in America. People were still reeling from the Manson cult murders of the late 1960s and the rise of serial killing sprees by culprits like the Zodiac and Alphabet killers who seemed to use ritual patterns in their murders.

There was also the beginnings of modern Satanism through Anton LaVey, who wrote The Satanic Bible and founded the Church of Satan in 1966. People like John Todd and David Hanson began to plant ideas that evil witchy cults run the world. So, a film with spiritual possession and green vomit spewing all over the place absolutely played further into those fears.

But The Exorcist isn’t the first film depiction of a Ouija board as a gateway to possession. The Uninvited (1944) features siblings who host a séance to find out the truth behind a death in the home. It apparently isn’t same level the scare fest of The Exorcist.

Suddenly, the Ouija board became an evil and demonic tool. Americans became more consumed by Satanic Panic in the 1980s after a group of Californian kids told their community that their school was a location for rape, prostitution, and satanic activities. These unproven allegations led to a wave of fear among the American public.

So, anything that could be even remotely associated with evil or the occult like the Ouija board, Dungeons & Dragons, and certain types of music became evil. It became even more interesting to rebellious youth who would use them in secret for some possible thrills and scares. Parker Brothers later became acquired by Hasbro, which still continued to sell thousands of boards. Hasbro still sells Ouija boards and owns the trademark for the name.

Ouija boards remain in our current public consciousness as stories about demonic possession continue the thrive. In November 2014, 35 Bolivian students were hospitalized because of trances, sweating, and rapid heartbeats after playing with a Ouija board. There have been stories of mass fainting and spirit possession in Mexico, hysteria, and even the rise of a 2015 viral game called ‘Charlie Charlie.’ Players would create a make shift version of a Ouija board with “yes” and “no” on a piece of paper. The game uses two pencils to supposedly chat with a demonic spirit.

Ouija Boards In Film and TV

Meanwhile, the Ouija board’s new notoriety as a symbol of evil took over the horror genre. In 1986, the first movie in the Witchboard franchise hit theaters. The story follows Linda and Jim, who become haunted by a ghost after a Ouija board session with Jim’s friend/Linda’s ex Brandon. Linda begins to act unusual and people predictably start to die.

Sorority House Massacre II (1990) taps into the “Ouija board as sleepover entertainment” trope with a group of sorority sisters who use the board to contact a deceased murderer. What Lies Beneath (2000) shows the main character, Claire, using one to contact a missing/possibly dead neighbor. In 2007, Paranormal Activity took Ouija boards to found-footage territory with a paranormal houseguest gaining power from the board.

Hasbro

That same year, the board finally got a film bearing its name. Ouija shows a group of kids who use a board and end up dealing with a stalkerish (and murderous) spirit. The film became a franchise with its latest installment releasing in 2016. And, in 2020, the Ouija board continues to make appearances in film and TV.

It’s most recent sighting is in Lovecraft Country, which takes place back in 1955 during pre-Satanic Panic and Exorcist times. A group of teens (including Emmitt Till) get some sinister foreshadowing while playing with the board in a basement. It’s a small scene that speaks to the Ouija board’s current pop culture place as a vehicle for spooky and sinister happenings.

Ouija Boards as a Modern Spiritual Tool

The Ouija board is still an available and mysterious game. But there are still people who use it for their own spiritual work and/or to guide others. Popular astrologer, witch, and apothecary owner, and YouTuber BehatiLife made an in-depth video about using a Ouija board safely. She says she doesn’t use it for connecting with spirits but rather leans into her abilities for spiritual connection.

She warns against using it if a user is afraid of the Ouija or lacks grounding and personal protection. BehatiLife says that mainstream media and YouTube feeds into the idea of demonic possessions through using one. A quick search of the website proves her point with countless videos about people sharing their Ouija board horror stories.

In fact, the general attitude among people who identify as occultists and/or witches is that a person who uses a Ouija board should be cautious, respectful, and use common sense. This is a sentiment in the board’s official description: “Handle the Ouija board with respect and it won’t disappoint you!” Some believe it can be a source of connection and enlightenment but can perhaps become dangerous with the wrong intention. Some people do use it to connect with their ancestors or find answers from the other side.

Of course, there is no scientific evidence to suggest that Ouija boards can contact the spirit world. Scientists have attributed the planchette’s movement to the ideomotor effect: the unconscious mind’s ability to direct motor activity. But, science certainly can’t and doesn’t explain every single phenomena on Earth, so perhaps there is something taking place. It’s all rather subjective depending on the user’s beliefs about spirit world, the afterlife, and demons.

The Ouija board continues to survive and thrive even after public panic, technological advances, and several generations of users who claim its everything from a connection tool for good to the work of a devil. It sits in the upper echelon of horror plot devices to tap into our deepest fears of losing control over our bodies or allowing an evil entity to slide its way into our space. And, whether its Halloween night, a girl’s sleepover, or a quite séance searching for answers, this iconic tool will likely remain a staple existing on society’s fringes.

Featured Image: Hasbro

The post The History Behind the Ouija Board is Both Pure and Evil appeared first on Nerdist.

Few linguistic debates have raged on more consistently than the one surrounding the proper pronunciation of the acronym, GIF. Fortunately, YouTuber and maker of things Tom Scott produced a video finally clearing up whether the word is pronounced with a hard or soft “g” sound. Once and for all. Kind of.

GIF, or Graphics Interchange Format, has been around since 1987, but, of course, retains its divisive pronunciation to this day. As Scott notes, American computer scientist Steve Wilhite coined the acronym. Wilhite led the CompuServe team that invented the GIF—the now widely used moving-image format—and says its soft “g” pronunciation is a deliberate reference to Jif peanut butter.

In fact, as Scott points out, Wilhite is extraordinarily adamant about pronouncing GIF like Jif. So much so that during a 2013 Webby Awards acceptance speech, Wilhite simply put up a gigantic slide that read, “It’s pronounced ‘JIF,’ not ‘GIF,'” and said nothing else. (See a clip of the speech immediately below. Regardless of your GIF stance, the moment’s fun to watch.)

Despite Wilhite’s protests, however, Scott notes pronouncing GIF with a hard “g” is still more popular. Not only that, but the Oxford English Dictionary also accepts both pronunciations as correct. (Wilhite, of course, says the Dictionary is totally wrong to allow for both pronunciations, however.)

As for the actual answer as to which pronunciation of GIF is correct? Unfortunately, Scott ends the video without ever providing a definitive ruling. But the fact that the acronym’s inventor says GIF is indeed pronounced with a soft “g” should lend it indomitable weight, right? Or maybe Scott is right about language being a living thing that changes over time regardless of intention. It’s hard to say.

The Webby Awards

Featured Image: Tom Scott 

The post Why We Can’t Stop Arguing About How to Pronounce GIF appeared first on Nerdist.