http://www.themarysue.com/its-about-gender-equality-now-on-women-and-statues-of-little-girls/

You may have noticed that there’s a new addition in the area of Wall Street. Across from the iconic (and aggressively male) bull that represents a buyer-friendly stock market now stands a statue of a defiant little girl staring the bull down. It’s an image that is simultaneously inspiring and disappointing.

First, the good stuff. The statue was created by a female artist named Kristen Visbal, who was commissioned to create the statue by State Street Global Advisors, a nearly $2.5 trillion investor and unit within State Street Corporation. State Street rolled out the statue yesterday, ahead of today’s activities spotlighting the contributions of women. While it’s only supposed to be there for a month, they are looking into making it a more permanent fixture.

The purpose of the statue? According to Business Insider, State Street has done this as part of a campaign to pressure companies to add more women to their boards. Lori Heinel, State Street’s deputy global chief investment officer said, “There has been a lot of discussion on this topic, but the needle hasn’t moved materially.”

She then goes on to explain the thinking behind the statue:

“One of the most iconic images on Wall Street is the charging bull. So the idea of having a female sort of stand against the bull or stand up to the bull just struck us as a very clever but also creative and engaging way to make that statement. Even though it’s a little girl, her stance is one of determination, forwardness, and being willing to challenge and take on the status quo.”

I can get behind that message. It’s true that more women need to be on boards. Indeed, there should be more women in all decision-making positions. I’m heartened by the fact that a company like State Street even wanted to do something like this. All of that is good stuff.

The sticking point for many, however, is the fact that on International Women’s Day, in order to encourage placing more women on boards, the statue is of a girl.

I can imagine the possible thought process behind this. Perhaps it’s a girl, because the artist wanted to evoke a “David and Goliath” vibe, and having the female facing down the huge bull be a child was seen as more successful in doing that. Perhaps it’s a girl, because the artist wanted young girls to see themselves in it. Mothers and older women would get the message about boards, while girls would get the simple message that a female presence in business is important.

However, many have remarked that, as well-meaning as this statue might be, the image of a young girl is palatable. It’s non-threatening. As defiant as she is, she’s still a child, and it seems that we as a society are much more comfortable with girls being rebellious than we are with grown women who are the same. In general, we place a high premium on youth, no matter what one’s gender. However, it’s more important for women to stay looking and acting as young as possible for as long as possible, because only then can we be tolerated and controlled. Only when we’re being demure are we pleasing. A little girl being defiant is cute. A woman being defiant is a threat.

Imagine the same statue, but instead of a young girl, it’s a 40-year-old woman in a dress blowing in the wind. Hands on hips, or hand outstretched to stop the bull. I’d say imagine her in a pants suit, but I want the image to look exactly as feminine as the current statue, just more mature. What do you think of the image now? No really. Picture it. What if it were a 65-year-old woman?

The other part of this is that feminist discourse is often about the future. About making the world better for our daughters. Images of powerful little girls appeal, because we imagine a world in which we all grow up with confidence and remain confident. The problem is: I don’t want gender equality in some unnamed and distant future. I want gender equality right now. I want women who are alive at this very moment to experience full and true equality in their lifetimes.

The more we talk about our hypothetical “daughters,” the easier it is to push off present-day solutions. Talking about our daughters is a distraction from the very real things we could be doing to move the needle forward in all areas of our lives right now. There is absolutely nothing stopping companies from recruiting more women, paying them the same as they pay men for the same position and with the same amount of seniority, or improving their policies to be more female friendly. Nothing, that is, except ingrained sexism.

That’s why it’s all the more important to talk about gender equality in the present tense, rather than as a hypothetical abstract that we’ll get around to someday. Little girls should have statues of women to look up to. We should honor the tough, brilliant, determined women that are fighting today. Women that are here now, and deserve respect and opportunity.

Women, not girls, should be treated as inspirational images. This isn’t to say that girls can’t inspire. Of course they can (have you seen Teen Vogue lately? Have you seen Malala?). This is to say that a grown-ass woman standing up for what she believes in is something that should be revered, not feared.

(featured image via Women’s March)

The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

Follow The Mary Sue on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Pinterest, & Google+.

March 8, 2017

It’s About Gender Equality Now: On Women and Statues of Little Girls

http://www.themarysue.com/its-about-gender-equality-now-on-women-and-statues-of-little-girls/

You may have noticed that there’s a new addition in the area of Wall Street. Across from the iconic (and aggressively male) bull that represents a buyer-friendly stock market now stands a statue of a defiant little girl staring the bull down. It’s an image that is simultaneously inspiring and disappointing.

First, the good stuff. The statue was created by a female artist named Kristen Visbal, who was commissioned to create the statue by State Street Global Advisors, a nearly $2.5 trillion investor and unit within State Street Corporation. State Street rolled out the statue yesterday, ahead of today’s activities spotlighting the contributions of women. While it’s only supposed to be there for a month, they are looking into making it a more permanent fixture.

The purpose of the statue? According to Business Insider, State Street has done this as part of a campaign to pressure companies to add more women to their boards. Lori Heinel, State Street’s deputy global chief investment officer said, “There has been a lot of discussion on this topic, but the needle hasn’t moved materially.”

She then goes on to explain the thinking behind the statue:

“One of the most iconic images on Wall Street is the charging bull. So the idea of having a female sort of stand against the bull or stand up to the bull just struck us as a very clever but also creative and engaging way to make that statement. Even though it’s a little girl, her stance is one of determination, forwardness, and being willing to challenge and take on the status quo.”

I can get behind that message. It’s true that more women need to be on boards. Indeed, there should be more women in all decision-making positions. I’m heartened by the fact that a company like State Street even wanted to do something like this. All of that is good stuff.

The sticking point for many, however, is the fact that on International Women’s Day, in order to encourage placing more women on boards, the statue is of a girl.

I can imagine the possible thought process behind this. Perhaps it’s a girl, because the artist wanted to evoke a “David and Goliath” vibe, and having the female facing down the huge bull be a child was seen as more successful in doing that. Perhaps it’s a girl, because the artist wanted young girls to see themselves in it. Mothers and older women would get the message about boards, while girls would get the simple message that a female presence in business is important.

However, many have remarked that, as well-meaning as this statue might be, the image of a young girl is palatable. It’s non-threatening. As defiant as she is, she’s still a child, and it seems that we as a society are much more comfortable with girls being rebellious than we are with grown women who are the same. In general, we place a high premium on youth, no matter what one’s gender. However, it’s more important for women to stay looking and acting as young as possible for as long as possible, because only then can we be tolerated and controlled. Only when we’re being demure are we pleasing. A little girl being defiant is cute. A woman being defiant is a threat.

Imagine the same statue, but instead of a young girl, it’s a 40-year-old woman in a dress blowing in the wind. Hands on hips, or hand outstretched to stop the bull. I’d say imagine her in a pants suit, but I want the image to look exactly as feminine as the current statue, just more mature. What do you think of the image now? No really. Picture it. What if it were a 65-year-old woman?

The other part of this is that feminist discourse is often about the future. About making the world better for our daughters. Images of powerful little girls appeal, because we imagine a world in which we all grow up with confidence and remain confident. The problem is: I don’t want gender equality in some unnamed and distant future. I want gender equality right now. I want women who are alive at this very moment to experience full and true equality in their lifetimes.

The more we talk about our hypothetical “daughters,” the easier it is to push off present-day solutions. Talking about our daughters is a distraction from the very real things we could be doing to move the needle forward in all areas of our lives right now. There is absolutely nothing stopping companies from recruiting more women, paying them the same as they pay men for the same position and with the same amount of seniority, or improving their policies to be more female friendly. Nothing, that is, except ingrained sexism.

That’s why it’s all the more important to talk about gender equality in the present tense, rather than as a hypothetical abstract that we’ll get around to someday. Little girls should have statues of women to look up to. We should honor the tough, brilliant, determined women that are fighting today. Women that are here now, and deserve respect and opportunity.

Women, not girls, should be treated as inspirational images. This isn’t to say that girls can’t inspire. Of course they can (have you seen Teen Vogue lately? Have you seen Malala?). This is to say that a grown-ass woman standing up for what she believes in is something that should be revered, not feared.

(featured image via Women’s March)

The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

Follow The Mary Sue on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Pinterest, & Google+.


March 8, 2017

Marvel Are Being Criticized For Pairing A Holocaust Survivor With A Nazi Lead Group

https://www.buzzfeed.com/krishrach/people-are-mad-that-marvel-paired-a-holocaust-survivor-with?utm_term=4ldqpia

The character of Magneto, a former Auschwitz prisoner, is suggested to be working for Hydra on an upcoming variant cover.

Last week, it was announced that there would be a series of variant covers for Marvel's upcoming Secret Empire comic event.

Last week, it was announced that there would be a series of variant covers for Marvel's upcoming Secret Empire comic event.

Marvel / Via newsarama.com

The press released stated that a number of Marvel villains would be, "Hydra's secret weapons in the war against the super heroes." Included on the list was the character Magneto.

The press released stated that a number of Marvel villains would be, "Hydra's secret weapons in the war against the super heroes." Included on the list was the character Magneto.

Marvel


View Entire List ›


March 8, 2017

10 Influential Women From Around The Globe We Recognize Today

http://madamenoire.com/798676/international-womens-day-2017/

Today millions of women will join together in solidarity through vocal displays and silent demonstrations to call attention to the contributions we have made to society. At a time when womanhood is under constant attack and our very ability to protect our rights is called into question, we stand united and show the power and poise of womanhood. In celebration of International Women’s Day, MadameNoire pays homage to 10 extraordinary women from around the globe who have had an undeniable impact on our world and serve as inspirations for millions of women today.

A post shared by Lu Collins (@blacsugabeauty_) on Feb 10, 2017 at 7:13am PST

Dame Eugenia Charles

Best known as the Caribbean’s first female prime minister, Dame Eugenia Charles’ legacy extends far beyond that title. A native of Dominica, Charles was born in a small fishing village outside of Roseau. She gained an interest in law at an early age and became the country’s first female lawyer. Gradually she became more interested in politics, particularly as a battle raged regarding freedom of the press. She would go on to form the Dominica Freedom Party and ultimately ascend to Prime Minister. Having survived two attempted coups during her tenure and given her hard-line stance on issues such as anti-corruption, she was dubbed the “Iron Lady of the Caribbean.” She may not have been perfect, but we have an immense amount of respect for a woman who thrived in a male-dominated and racist world.

The post 10 Influential Women From Around The Globe We Recognize Today appeared first on MadameNoire.


March 8, 2017

Adam Savage Examines GHOST IN THE SHELL’s Iconic Thermoptic Suit

http://nerdist.com/adam-savage-examines-ghost-in-the-shells-iconic-thermoptic-suit/

Later this month, the live-action American remake of Ghost in the Shell hits theaters, with Scarlett Johansson portraying the Major. Fans of the original Ghost in the Shell manga and anime are already familiar with the Thermoptic suit that the Major uses throughout the story, but the costume has been a major part of the promotional push for the movie. Now that we’ve gotten a better look at the suit, it’s even more impressive to learn that it is a practical effect and not a CGI costume.

During a recent episode of Tested, Adam Savage visited Weta to get the scoop on how they created the Thermoptic suit for Ghost in the Shell. To better illustrate how the costume fits on a person, Tested contributor Danica Chan bravely wore the costume while Weta costume technician Flo Foxworthy explained how the suit was created out of silicon, and it may be the first time that anyone has created a full hero suit from that material.

“The silicon just has an amazing texture and finish and stretch that you just don’t from foam latex or from any fabric,” said Foxworthy. “It’s really otherworldly and quite technologically advanced in appearance. And we can get these incredible details right into the costume. We would never have been able to do this with any other material.”

Foxworthy also pointed out the different types of silicon that were used in the costume, as well as the way that magnets hold parts of the costume together. The downside of silicon is that it can take on an imprint far too easily, which is why the costume has to be stored on a form fitting mannequin to keep its intended shape. It’s a magnificent creation, and we’re eager to see it in action when Ghost in the Shell is released on March 31.

What do you think about this behind-the-scenes look at the Thermoptic suit? Let’s discuss in the comment section below!

Image: Paramount Pictures