deerstalker
By Désirée I. Guzzetta
Giancarlo Esposito is having a moment in 2020, a very good one. Not only is he a key part of three very popular shows at one time, but he’s been nominated for two of them for this year’s Emmys, one for Outstanding Guest Actor In a Drama Series for his role as Moff Gideon on “The Mandalorian,” and one for Outstanding Supporting Actor In A Drama Series for his role as Gus Fring on “Better Call Saul.” He’s also been nominated twice before for playing Gus Fring on both “Better Call Saul” and its predecessor, “Breaking Bad.”
On top of that, he’s emerged as a main character on Amazon Prime Video’s “The Boys.” Introduced late in the first season as Stan Edgar, the mostly unseen, even more powerful boss behind the powerhouse that was Madelyn Stillwell (Elizabeth Shue), Esposito is poised to take Stan from the man behind the curtain to the man openly in charge of The Seven, the show’s group of superheroes against which The Boys of the title fight.
Maybe.
Speaking from his home with reporters via Zoom, Esposito was careful not to pull too much of the curtain back, preferring to leave some mystery to Stan and his motivations going into the new season, though he did indulge in a little fun speculation. He was also friendly, chatting with reporters prior to the official start of the roundtable, asking about people’s Zoom backgrounds and what they’ve been doing during the pandemic. His charming, relaxed demeanor is about as far from the tightly controlled, possibly villainous Stan Edgar the audience has seen so far as one could get.
In fact, the first question he was asked had to do with his roles as villains—in addition to playing Moff Gideon and Gus Fring (the jury is still out on Stan’s true character), Esposito also voices Lex Luthor on the current “Harley Quinn” animated TV series, and played bad guy Tom Neville on one of “The Boys” showrunner Eric Kripke’s past series, “Revolution” (2012-14).
Esposito said that what drew him to Stan “was that he was completely flat-lined about business. He was a company man who could be polite, and he’s running a very big organization.”
“What I love is that he’s the puppeteer behind the puppet,” Esposito said of the first season reveal that Stan was Madelyn’s boss. “He’s the guy behind the curtain,” he said, but at the same time, Stan is the “face of Vought.” Esposito loves that he will be visible as Vought’s leader, but that also audiences might expect more to come from him.
In terms of inspiration for playing villains, Esposito mentioned the famous “Top of the world!” scene in White Heat (1949) starring James Cagney, and how “that visceral excitement of triggering his tommy gun was the glory that he needed to end and get out of this life to the next.”
“I think people like characters who have villainy because they have power,” Esposito said philosophically. “They relate to the fact that there’s this power that they feel that we don’t have. So is that power courage? Is it? Is it a decision that that’s who I am? Whatever that is, that moment I saw Jimmy Cagney, he was fearless.”
Discussing the power dynamic in “The Boys,” Esposito said that they “have very super, super characters who have really heightened physical and mental qualities because they’re superheroes. Why don’t we feel like we’re superheroes in our lives? That’s all you’re feeling when you’re looking at a villain—like Homelander [Antony Starr] says, they can do whatever the fuck they want.”
Esposito believes people find that power dynamic interesting and relatable, though Stan is still an unknown quantity in “The Boys” because he’s been talked about more than seen so far.
“Maybe what he’s doing is to try to help and save everyone on the planet. Maybe he’s got to wrangle this group of super heroes and bring them to a place where they understand part of their humanity and part of the science which, we’re coming to find out, may be guiding their physical prowess,” he theorized.
“So how do we feel that way without being villainous or nefarious?” Esposito asked. “What’s the way to feel that way? I think many of us have missed that. That way is to be ultimately calm, and relaxed and chill, and to be in a more meditative yogic state.”
Esposito said that as an actor, his life is about accessing his emotions. When a corporation controls everything the way Vought does in “The Boys,” accessing one’s humanity becomes more difficult. He noted that so many of the characters in the show don’t just wear costumes on the outside, but mask their own humanity inside, too.
The Nerd Element then asked Esposito about his acting process and how he brings Stan to life in light of the very controlled characters he’s played more recently. For example, Stan appears to have that calm, chill demeanor he spoke of earlier, as well as no issue standing up to the very dangerous Homelander, whom the audience has already seen murder several people without hesitation.
“For Stan,” he began, “I felt an affinity to wanting to represent the corporate brain. And I hadn’t had an opportunity to do that before playing a character, whether you judge him to be nefarious or a company man.”
“I always want there to be a secret behind what I’m doing,” Esposito continued, saying that he wanted to make Stan relatable the way the rest of the show is relatable to the real world.
In Esposito’s mind, Stan cares about people, “but he doesn’t suffer fools and has no time for babies, which was a real guiding tool for me in the scene with Homelander—understanding and realizing he’s a man-child, which would immediately give me pause and a little compassion.”
He notes that the scene with Homelander where he questions Homelander’s knowledge of Vought was similar to what he asked his own children about supporting BLM (Black Lives Matter), including what they knew about the organization and if they knew who Edmund Pettus was, before they went out and marched in solidarity.
“Stan is the same way with Homelander,” he said, adding that none of us yet knows what Vought is doing or up to in the world of the series—the answers to which he finds “exciting” for the audience to discover.
Esposito also loves Stan’s directness: “He’s direct, he’s efficient with his words, and he’s a very good reader of people.” He said that Stan “understands when Homelander’s feelings are hurt, and he probably meant to hurt them in the moment he does when he dismisses Homelander from his office. He understands people’s emotional place about their struggle with who they really are.”
Stan “has no fear and so you wonder about that, don’t you? You wonder why he’s not looking at Homelander and shaking in his boots,” he said, adding that Stan is “so very confident that you want to know what else is going on. [But] he’s also about the face of things, the way things look. And so I’m very excited to explore more.”
Esposito was then asked if Stan is really that self-assured, or if he’s possibly bluffing in front of Homelander (presumably to keep himself from being immolated as Madelyn was).
“No, it’s not a bluff,” he said. “He’s completely self-assured, and he’s not bluffing at all.”
“One of the things I think about,” Esposito continued, “is that he’s full of Compound V. And he’s invincible. Because he’s so very clear, and so not afraid, and the company’s already built.”
Esposito said that’s “what makes his attitude so different than any other character I’ve played.” The fact that Stan is not afraid to lose Vought might mean something big is possibly in store for the character.
“What is that complete, self-assured intention? That’s a man who knows what he wants,” he said.
Esposito also knows what he wants, though he is a much kinder person than what we know of Stan Edgar. For example, during the course of the interview, when The Nerd Element congratulated him on his third Emmy nomination, he not only graciously corrected the error, but he sincerely thanked us. While he is grateful for the honors, he said, he was quick to praise everyone he works with. He was even happy to be talking to everyone on Zoom because he enjoys talking “about the work and its intricacies.”
“I love what I do,” he said, smiling.
Amazon Prime Video’s hit series, “The Boys,” returns September 4, 2020, for a second season of mayhem, fun, and corporate shenanigans, with three episodes being available at once, followed by one-per-week for the rest of the season
Quotes lightly edited for flow and clarity
The post Giancarlo Esposito Sheds Some Light On The Mysterious Stan Edgar of “The Boys” appeared first on The Nerd Element.
By Désirée I. Guzzetta
Giancarlo Esposito is having a moment in 2020, a very good one. Not only is he a key part of three very popular shows at one time, but he’s been nominated for two of them for this year’s Emmys, one for Outstanding Guest Actor In a Drama Series for his role as Moff Gideon on “The Mandalorian,” and one for Outstanding Supporting Actor In A Drama Series for his role as Gus Fring on “Better Call Saul.” He’s also been nominated twice before for playing Gus Fring on both “Better Call Saul” and its predecessor, “Breaking Bad.”
On top of that, he’s emerged as a main character on Amazon Prime Video’s “The Boys.” Introduced late in the first season as Stan Edgar, the mostly unseen, even more powerful boss behind the powerhouse that was Madelyn Stillwell (Elizabeth Shue), Esposito is poised to take Stan from the man behind the curtain to the man openly in charge of The Seven, the show’s group of superheroes against which The Boys of the title fight.
Maybe.
Speaking from his home with reporters via Zoom, Esposito was careful not to pull too much of the curtain back, preferring to leave some mystery to Stan and his motivations going into the new season, though he did indulge in a little fun speculation. He was also friendly, chatting with reporters prior to the official start of the roundtable, asking about people’s Zoom backgrounds and what they’ve been doing during the pandemic. His charming, relaxed demeanor is about as far from the tightly controlled, possibly villainous Stan Edgar the audience has seen so far as one could get.
In fact, the first question he was asked had to do with his roles as villains—in addition to playing Moff Gideon and Gus Fring (the jury is still out on Stan’s true character), Esposito also voices Lex Luthor on the current “Harley Quinn” animated TV series, and played bad guy Tom Neville on one of “The Boys” showrunner Eric Kripke’s past series, “Revolution” (2012-14).
Esposito said that what drew him to Stan “was that he was completely flat-lined about business. He was a company man who could be polite, and he’s running a very big organization.”
“What I love is that he’s the puppeteer behind the puppet,” Esposito said of the first season reveal that Stan was Madelyn’s boss. “He’s the guy behind the curtain,” he said, but at the same time, Stan is the “face of Vought.” Esposito loves that he will be visible as Vought’s leader, but that also audiences might expect more to come from him.
In terms of inspiration for playing villains, Esposito mentioned the famous “Top of the world!” scene in White Heat (1949) starring James Cagney, and how “that visceral excitement of triggering his tommy gun was the glory that he needed to end and get out of this life to the next.”
“I think people like characters who have villainy because they have power,” Esposito said philosophically. “They relate to the fact that there’s this power that they feel that we don’t have. So is that power courage? Is it? Is it a decision that that’s who I am? Whatever that is, that moment I saw Jimmy Cagney, he was fearless.”
Discussing the power dynamic in “The Boys,” Esposito said that they “have very super, super characters who have really heightened physical and mental qualities because they’re superheroes. Why don’t we feel like we’re superheroes in our lives? That’s all you’re feeling when you’re looking at a villain—like Homelander [Antony Starr] says, they can do whatever the fuck they want.”
Esposito believes people find that power dynamic interesting and relatable, though Stan is still an unknown quantity in “The Boys” because he’s been talked about more than seen so far.
“Maybe what he’s doing is to try to help and save everyone on the planet. Maybe he’s got to wrangle this group of super heroes and bring them to a place where they understand part of their humanity and part of the science which, we’re coming to find out, may be guiding their physical prowess,” he theorized.
“So how do we feel that way without being villainous or nefarious?” Esposito asked. “What’s the way to feel that way? I think many of us have missed that. That way is to be ultimately calm, and relaxed and chill, and to be in a more meditative yogic state.”
Esposito said that as an actor, his life is about accessing his emotions. When a corporation controls everything the way Vought does in “The Boys,” accessing one’s humanity becomes more difficult. He noted that so many of the characters in the show don’t just wear costumes on the outside, but mask their own humanity inside, too.
The Nerd Element then asked Esposito about his acting process and how he brings Stan to life in light of the very controlled characters he’s played more recently. For example, Stan appears to have that calm, chill demeanor he spoke of earlier, as well as no issue standing up to the very dangerous Homelander, whom the audience has already seen murder several people without hesitation.
“For Stan,” he began, “I felt an affinity to wanting to represent the corporate brain. And I hadn’t had an opportunity to do that before playing a character, whether you judge him to be nefarious or a company man.”
“I always want there to be a secret behind what I’m doing,” Esposito continued, saying that he wanted to make Stan relatable the way the rest of the show is relatable to the real world.
In Esposito’s mind, Stan cares about people, “but he doesn’t suffer fools and has no time for babies, which was a real guiding tool for me in the scene with Homelander—understanding and realizing he’s a man-child, which would immediately give me pause and a little compassion.”
He notes that the scene with Homelander where he questions Homelander’s knowledge of Vought was similar to what he asked his own children about supporting BLM (Black Lives Matter), including what they knew about the organization and if they knew who Edmund Pettus was, before they went out and marched in solidarity.
“Stan is the same way with Homelander,” he said, adding that none of us yet knows what Vought is doing or up to in the world of the series—the answers to which he finds “exciting” for the audience to discover.
Esposito also loves Stan’s directness: “He’s direct, he’s efficient with his words, and he’s a very good reader of people.” He said that Stan “understands when Homelander’s feelings are hurt, and he probably meant to hurt them in the moment he does when he dismisses Homelander from his office. He understands people’s emotional place about their struggle with who they really are.”
Stan “has no fear and so you wonder about that, don’t you? You wonder why he’s not looking at Homelander and shaking in his boots,” he said, adding that Stan is “so very confident that you want to know what else is going on. [But] he’s also about the face of things, the way things look. And so I’m very excited to explore more.”
Esposito was then asked if Stan is really that self-assured, or if he’s possibly bluffing in front of Homelander (presumably to keep himself from being immolated as Madelyn was).
“No, it’s not a bluff,” he said. “He’s completely self-assured, and he’s not bluffing at all.”
“One of the things I think about,” Esposito continued, “is that he’s full of Compound V. And he’s invincible. Because he’s so very clear, and so not afraid, and the company’s already built.”
Esposito said that’s “what makes his attitude so different than any other character I’ve played.” The fact that Stan is not afraid to lose Vought might mean something big is possibly in store for the character.
“What is that complete, self-assured intention? That’s a man who knows what he wants,” he said.
Esposito also knows what he wants, though he is a much kinder person than what we know of Stan Edgar. For example, during the course of the interview, when The Nerd Element congratulated him on his third Emmy nomination, he not only graciously corrected the error, but he sincerely thanked us. While he is grateful for the honors, he said, he was quick to praise everyone he works with. He was even happy to be talking to everyone on Zoom because he enjoys talking “about the work and its intricacies.”
“I love what I do,” he said, smiling.
Amazon Prime Video’s hit series, “The Boys,” returns September 4, 2020, for a second season of mayhem, fun, and corporate shenanigans, with three episodes being available at once, followed by one-per-week for the rest of the season
Quotes lightly edited for flow and clarity
The post Giancarlo Esposito Sheds Some Light On The Mysterious Stan Edgar of “The Boys” appeared first on The Nerd Element.
Now this might finally make Fetch happen. For no apparent reason, Pillsbury has finally honored Gretchen Wieners and the iconic 2004 film in which she appeared with … limited edition Mean Girls toaster strudel? On Wednesdays they wear pink … icing.
Yes. This is an entirely real, and fitting honor for the young lady whose father invented the delicious treat. And I gotta say, that strawberry-cream cheese combo looks pretty delicious.
But why is this happening 16 years after Mean Girls hit the screens? (Yes, now you feel old, so do I.) I have no idea. Maybe it has something to do with Mean Girls day next month! (It’s October 3rd!) Or maybe it’s somehow related to the rumored meta-movie adaption of the Mean Girls musical? The promotion also includes a contest for the best pink icing art and the prize for the winner includes Mean Girls merch, a personalized video message from Gretchen Wieners herself, Lacey Chabert, and most importantly, a year’s with of toaster strudel!
And ALL for Gretchen Wieners! 💕 Announcing NEW @MeanGirls Inspired Toaster Strudel with Limited Edition Pink Icing! pic.twitter.com/8PjAhQYNej
— Toaster Strudel (@ToasterStrudel) September 2, 2020
There’s a lot of weird advertising out there—but at least this one looks pretty tasty, if somewhat inexplicable?
(via: Delish, image: Paramount)
Here are a few other things we saw today:
- Peter Thiel is, amazingly, even worse than we thought. (via Buzzfeed)
- New York Times reporters asked attendees why they weren’t masked at a Trump rally and then they were asked to leave. (via HuffPost)
- And to complete the trifecta of horrible news today, money earmarked for 9/11 first responders’ healthcare … has just gone missing. (via New York Daily News)
- THIS CAST THO!
Okay, the anticipation for “The Harder They Fall” just got SUPER real!!
The amazing Zazie Beetz, Regina King, Delroy Lindo, LaKeith Stanfield, Danielle Deadwyler, Edi Gathegi and RJ Cyler join Jonathan Majors and Idris Elba in the Western – coming soon to @netflix!! pic.twitter.com/MHvhOdIUNH
— Strong Black Lead (@strongblacklead) September 11, 2020
- Inside the endings that aren’t really endings of Keeping Up With The Kardashians and The Walking Dead. (via The Hollywood Reporter)
- Karen Han Argues that Mulan‘s villain was in the right (she was!). (via Polygon)
- Yes please, take my money.
Crack open a cold beverage with the Infinity Gauntlet and Mjölnir. https://t.co/Dk3S9deZg8
— Nerdist (@nerdist) September 11, 2020
And finally, Oregon is facing catastrophic damage and evacuations due to massive wildfires. If you can, please help and to everyone else in the West, stay safe.
Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!
—The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—
When Bob Woodward shared some revelations from a series of interviews he did with Donald Trump earlier this year, people were angry. Much of the anger was directed at Trump, obviously, who can be heard in recordings talking about how deadly the coronavirus is at a time when he was downplaying its threat to the public, comparing it to the flu and calling it a hoax being pushed by the Democratic Party for political gain. He told Woodward that he was downplaying the virus knowingly and deliberately because he didn’t want to “create a panic,” choosing instead to gaslight a country while hundreds of thousands of people died.
So of course people were angry with Trump. But people were also angry with Woodward for keeping these interviews to himself, only releasing them six and more months later in the lead-up to his book release.
Now Woodward is trying to defend his decision to sit on this information so long. The AP writes:
“He tells me this, and I’m thinking, ‘Wow, that’s interesting, but is it true?’ Trump says things that don’t check out, right?” Woodward told the AP during a telephone interview. Using a famous phrase from the Watergate era, when Woodward’s reporting for the Post helped lead to President Richard Nixon’s resignation, Woodward said his mission was to determine, “What did he know and when did he know it?”
It’s totally understandable for Woodward not to rush out and hastily publish this story before he knows what’s what. But the more he tries to explain why he waited so long, the more callous and calculating he ends up sounding.
“If I had done the story at that time about what he knew in February, that’s not telling us anything we didn’t know,” Woodward said. At that point, he said, the issue was no longer one of public health but of politics. His priority became getting the story out before the election in November.
“That was the demarcation line for me,” he said. “Had I decided that my book was coming out on Christmas, the end of this year, that would have been unthinkable.”
So he wanted to influence the election but has nothing to say about the nearly 200,000 people who have died between that interview and this week when he released the audio as promotion for his book?
Some are defending Woodward, saying it wouldn’t have made any difference if he’d shared what Trump told him earlier. And maybe that’s true. But we don’t know that, and it seems like a journalist has an ethical obligation to share something like this with the public. Also, who does it help to be so complacent about Trump’s actions and the reactions of his base?
There is no ethical or moral defense of Woodward’s decision to not publish these tapes as soon as they were made. If there was any chance it could save a single life, he was obligated to do so. Bob Woodward put making money over his moral and professional duty.
— john r stanton (@dcbigjohn) September 9, 2020
This is the same shit people were telling me about Bob Woodward. “It wouldn’t have mattered if he said anything.” You don’t know that. Why are you defending these people. They don’t care about you. Stop it https://t.co/IE0rBPR0QA
— Imani Gandy ☄️🌏🔥 (@AngryBlackLady) September 10, 2020
Like, as a young Woodward got information, he published it, as fast as it was coming in, and brought a horrifying scandal to light in front of a critical nation, eventually forcing the President to resign in shame and disgrace.
Which turns out to be great for book sales.
— Sean Kelly (@StorySlug) September 10, 2020
Meanwhile, Donald Trump is trying to weaponize Woodward’s delay.
Earlier today he tweeted: “Bob Woodward had my quotes for many months. If he thought they were so bad or dangerous, why didn’t he immediately report them in an effort to save lives? Didn’t he have an obligation to do so? No, because he knew they were good and proper answers. Calm, no panic!”
Bob Woodward had my quotes for many months. If he thought they were so bad or dangerous, why didn’t he immediately report them in an effort to save lives? Didn’t he have an obligation to do so? No, because he knew they were good and proper answers. Calm, no panic!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 10, 2020
Then at a press conference this afternoon, he said the Woodward revelation was “stuff that everyone knew,” which it was not. “If Bob Woodward thought what I said was bad, then he should have immediately, right after I said it, gone out to the authorities so they can prepare and let them know.”
But which authorities is he talking about exactly? Isn’t Trump the authority here? Or maybe the team that briefed Trump on the dangers of the virus, whom he then ignored? Who is Trump suggesting Woodward should have gone to with this information?
In this quote he 1) blames Bob Woodward for not making a public health announcement; 2) says the “fake media” knew it was bad, but somehow Woodward didn’t (he’s not part of the media?); then says 3) he did the interview only because he wanted to see if Woodward can “write good.” https://t.co/TB9inlU4gZ
— Ed Solomon (@ed_solomon) September 10, 2020
Trump trying to pin him lying on Woodward, like: if it was so bad, why didn’t he report. Which is a trap that Woodward didn’t need to walk into.
— Person Woman Man Camera TV (@ClaraJeffery) September 10, 2020
Trump then blamed Bob Woodward for not telling people that he lied earlier. https://t.co/ZZRSVqi4Rp
— Jon Favreau (@jonfavs) September 10, 2020
President Woodward really screwed up his covid response. @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/r8tX3nNBeL
— NoelCaslerComedy (@CaslerNoel) September 10, 2020
After defending intentionally downplaying the coronavirus threat, blaming Bob Woodward and listing off the extensive amount of television he watched last night, President Trump leaves the briefing room after only taking three questions.
— Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) September 10, 2020
Every single part of this whole story is awful.
(image: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!
—The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—